AI vendor evaluation · for healthcare

Stop paying $20,000+ for vendor evaluation.

Upload vendor RFP responses, pricing schedules, contracts, technical and security documentation — and get an analyst-grade, side-by-side comparison back the same day.

VendorEvaluate reads every document a vendor sends you, scores it against the criteria your team cares about, and produces the structured comparison you can take to your steering committee — the one a $20K consultant would otherwise hand-craft over six weeks.

Drop your first documentHow it works
hrs
not weeks
1 doc pile
every artifact
$0
consultant fees
Drop folder · ingestion
5 docs · 312 pp
  • RFP response — Vendor APROPOSAL
  • Pricing schedule T3PRICING
  • Master services agreementCONTRACT
  • SOC 2 + HITRUST reportSECURITY
  • Technical — API + SLOsTECHNICAL
Extracting · entities, claims, gaps…step 2 / 5
How it works

Three steps from document drop to defensible decision.

No data leaves your browser until you submit. No PHI required. The evaluation runs against the documents a vendor sends you — the same ones a $20K consultant would charge you to re-read.

  1. 01

    Drop the documents

    RFP responses, pricing schedules, MSAs, BAA/HIPAA terms, SOC 2 and HITRUST reports, API and SLO specs — one folder per vendor.

  2. 02

    Set your criteria

    Pick the dimensions that matter to this evaluation: clinical fit, integration burden, security posture, total cost, support model. Bring your own scoring rubric.

  3. 03

    Get the side-by-side

    VendorEvaluate returns an analyst-grade comparison matrix — claimed vs. verified, gaps and risks called out, a weighted recommendation — usually within hours.

For hospital systems

Stop letting a $20K consultant gate your vendor decision.

An executive-grade comparison — at clinical-safety speed.

Your steering committee is meeting next Tuesday, and the vendor either wins the contract or it doesn’t. A six-week consultant engagement no longer fits the timeline.

What VendorEvaluate delivers

  • Parallel evaluation of 2–5 vendors against your published criteria
  • Clinical-safety, compliance, and total-cost evidence surfaced in plain prose
  • A defensible audit trail: every claim traced back to the source document
  • A steering-committee-ready deck in hours, not weeks
For health system IT

Integration risk, called out before you sign the MSA.

Read-only against vendor docs — no prod access, no PHI.

Integration is the single biggest reason EHR and clinical-application rollouts slip. Catch the integration debt during evaluation, not at go-live.

What VendorEvaluate delivers

  • API surface spec diff’ed against your existing integration patterns
  • HL7 / FHIR / SMART-on-FHIR coverage scored against your interoperability roadmap
  • Identity and SSO requirements mapped to your IdP (Okta, Entra, Imprivata)
  • Infrastructure footprint — cloud regions, network egress, deploy model — extracted from vendor docs
For procurement teams

Side-by-side pricing, where the discounts hide.

Pricing, contract terms, and risk in one matrix.

Vendor pricing pages are written to hide the delta between list and floor. VendorEvaluate extracts the real numbers and puts them next to each other.

What VendorEvaluate delivers

  • Pricing schedules normalized to the same units (per seat, per encounter, per integration)
  • Year-over-year escalation, ramp, and discount tiers pulled from every quote
  • MSA / BAA / DPA terms reviewed against your standard — deviations flagged with severity
  • Negotiation-leverage brief: what each vendor is likely to concede, based on their own docs
The output

What an evaluation actually looks like.

A single side-by-side matrix, sourced from the documents a vendor actually sent you. Every cell traces back; every gap is marked.

Sample comparison matrix
EHR replacement · 3 vendors · 12 criteria
Criterion
Vendor AVendor BVendor C
  • Clinical workflow fit
    StrongAdequateWeak — gap noted
  • HL7 v2 / FHIR R4 coverage
    FullPartial — ADT gapsFull + SMART
  • Identity (SSO/IdP)
    Okta + EntraOkta onlyOkta + Entra + Imprivata
  • Pricing (3-yr TCO)
    $4.2M$3.6M$5.1M — premium
  • SOC 2 + HITRUST
    SOC 2 (expired)SOC 2 + HITRUST CSFSOC 2 + HITRUST r2
  • Implementation timeline
    9 months6 months12 months
Every cell cites the source document. Every “gap noted” is an explicit risk the steering committee voted on.2 of 12 criteria contested
30-minute walkthrough · on a real RFP pair

See VendorEvaluate grade two RFPs you already have.

Pick one current evaluation. We will run VendorEvaluate against the documents you bring and walk through the resulting matrix together. No slideware — the analysis is the demo.

We respond within one business day.
No sales sequence. No SDR follow-up.

Analyst-grade output

Not a chatbot summary — a comparison matrix.

Every claim sourced

Per-cell citations back to the source PDF.

Defensible audit trail

Tracing your committee can re-run.